Subject guides: an undervalued resource
Library bloggers like to write about big ideas. Academic freedom, the digital divide, and intellectual property are popular topics in the biblioblogosphere. Today I want to discuss something a bit more mundane but certainly relevant to academic librarianship and hopefully interesting as well. Today I want to talk about subject guides.
For anyone unfamiliar with the term, a subject guide is a list of resources that are appropriate for doing research on a given topic. The list is assembled (and sometimes annotated) by a librarian, and it is usually presented as a webpage. For an example, you can take a look at the McGill Library’s subject guides.
Subject guides fascinate me because librarians put their blood, sweat, and tears into creating them and value them as essential research tools, while most students are entirely unaware of their existence. From the perspective of a librarian, the importance of these guides is clear. Especially for students who have little experience with research, the guides are the perfect place to start, and in many cases could help them avoid a trip to the reference desk (not that I would ever discourage a student from going to see a reference librarian, but first of all subject guides are available 24/7, and secondly it can be embarrassing to approach a librarian and say “I have no idea where to start.”). After spending some time working on these documents, a librarian may begin to wonder how students ever performed research at all without them.
Looking back on my own academic career, however, I had certainly never heard of subject guides until I started library school, and I believe this is a common experience for undergrads. This past spring, I held a focus group for students to gather their thoughts on subject guides and found that most of them were unfamiliar with the concept (some had also never heard of liaison librarians, but that’s another issue).
It can be incredibly frustrating to work so hard on something that most students will never even notice, so how can we resolve this situation? One option would be to scrap the guides altogether, but I don’t think most librarians are prepared to abandon such great potential. Another possibility would be to make the guides more “hip” instead of the usual boring HTML pages (LibGuides comes to mind as an attractive, Web 2.0-ish alternative), but although students might prefer this type of guide, it does not help with the problem of students being unaware of the guides altogether. I believe the best way to encourage students to use these resources is to make them part of the school’s culture of research. A good start would be to make them available (and prominent) through the Course Management System or Virtual Learning Environment (e.g., WebCT, Moodle, etc.). From there, librarians should work with professors, especially in first and second year undergrad courses, to promote the guides, and when librarians make presentations to classes they should always highlight the appropriate subject guides.
Have you worked on subject guides at your school? How have they been received by students? What are your suggestions for promoting them? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Labels: research tools, subject guides


4 Comments:
I've worked a bit with LibGuides, and agree that they are more attractive than the old HTML pages, and from what I've seen on the Reference desk, students do like them. However, yes, no one knows they exist! Working with the professors to market the guides, mentioning them during information literacy instruction and during teachable moments on the service desks are some ideas. What about also making them more prominent on the library home page? Somehow drawing more attention to them?
Here at Ryerson, we've managed to get a pilot project on the go for course specific research guides available within Blackboard. There are loads of privacy concerns to hurdle, as well as having the in house techie know-how to make it work. We are lucky enough to have the latter (Graham McCarthy, Library Systems Analyst extraordinaire), but have only managed to get the one department on board. As with so many pilot projects, we hope that the benefits of this service will outweigh any potential faculty concerns for the protection of their course content.
It's also an awesome way to open a dialogue with faculty about the potential for partnerships with academic librarians to work toward student success, and demonstrates how we offer unique and value added service.
Right ... it's Friday. A pint is calling my name ... :)
A plug for SubjectsPlus (http://www.ithacalibrary.com/subsplus/) which is an open source alternative to LibGuides (and predates it)--a new more 2.0 draggy/droppy version will be released in the next week or so.
At Ithaca College (Ithaca, NY), we found adding the guides to the homepage + a random picture of one of the subject specialists drove more traffic to the guides. Home page here: http://www.ithaca.edu/library/ .
Lots of people are saying (with research to back it up) that tying your guides to courses rather than subjects makes them more appealing to students, and we are trying to move in this direction.
Andrew
To backtrack from the problems with promoting subject guides: the purpose of the guide can help us determine how to promote it, but the purpose is often unfocused. As Amy recently discussed on informing thoughts, it's hard as heck to design library websites that meet the needs of so many diverse groups: students just beginning their studies, more experienced undergraduates, grad students, faculty, library staff, university staff, general public, librarians at other institutions... The same applies to subject guides. Students who are just beginning a research paper need to have the information overload minimized. Grad students and faculty want comprehensive lists of the materials that are relevant to their subject. Other librarians who are unfamiliar with the subject want hints on what to recommend to clients.
Does anyone create guides with specific groups in mind? If not, how can the different needs be balanced?
Post a Comment
<< Home