Friday, October 09, 2009

Customer Service

I was visiting Chapters yesterday looking for The Predictioneer's Game by Bruce Bueno de Mesquita. Like many customers, I could remember the name of the book, but not the author, so I went up to one of Chapters' new handy-dandy Apple-esque "search" stations and did a straightforward keyword search. Up popped the title, they had three copies and off I went to the "History and Political Science" section to find the book. But, of course, once I got there I couldn't find the book. I knew the general section and the title, but nothing more specific. As I stood there, probably looking lost and confused, one of the sales associates came up and asked if he could help. I explained my problem to him and before I could even finish he was off to double check everything I told him on the computer. It took him twice as long as it took me to find the title (and he was using the advanced search) and was condescending towards me when I tried to explain that it was faster to use the keyword search (as it was the only hit using that method). He then informed me I was looking in the completely wrong section, while taking me back to the exact section I was previously in. The sections had been mislabeled, meaning that even though I was in the right section originally (according to the labels) the books had been shifted, so the book I was looking for was a few bays down. I was so irritated by the service that I left without buying the book.

Now, this rant about Chapters' customer service does have a point (I'm not simply complaining - I swear!). This sales associate broke every rule in the library customer service book. He assumed the information I found on my own was incorrect (it wasn't), he ignored my expertise in favour of his own way to doing things (he didn't know I was a librarian, but I was able to find the book's record faster than he did using the dreaded keyword searching), and he did not acknowledge the poor labeling and layout of the store as being primary to the problem.

If the research is to be believed, most customers (both of bookstores and libraries) prefer bookstores. Heck, sometimes I prefer to go to a bookstore. They're comfortable and clean. The books are shiny and new. There's usually a really good coffee place attached. But we're the ones with the strong customer service orientation. We provide the good customer service. Or do we? How many librarians have you worked with that have done exactly what the sales associate did to me? Whenever I experience poor customer service, I try to remember what went wrong and then make sure I NEVER do the same thing to one of my patrons. But I've never been able to figure out a way to have the customer service discussion with colleagues who behave differently towards patrons that I do. What do you guys do in these situations?

3 Comments:

At 9:20 PM, Blogger Megan said...

I think the stakes are much higher with customer-service failures in libraries. Even if you didn't buy the book this time, I'm sure you'll go back to Chapters (in person or online!), but someone who has a negative experience with a librarian might never return.

Unfortunately, I am also at loss regarding what to do when I see another librarian have a public service interaction that is less than ideal. Once or twice I've gone to look for a student after they've left the desk to follow up with what I perceived was left unanswered, or to offer my card so that they have someone to ask directly if they need help again. But that doesn't really change the larger problem.

(Disclaimer: This is not to say that I'm perfect. Goodness knows that I've had some rather lousy interactions clients, which cause me to toss and turn at night... But I'm constantly learning!)

I attended a great conference presentation by Dale Vidmar about peer-mentoring/evaluation for reference work that sounded like it was very effective both in improving service for students and increasing librarians' own sense of efficacy. It was an inspiring talk, and I would very much like to take part in a similar peer-evaluation system in the future. (The presentation was titled "Intentional Reference: Implementing Formative Assessment through Reflective Peer Facilitation," slides and other materials posted on the conference site).

 
At 10:59 AM, Anonymous Jennifer Walker said...

This may be earning me the title of "Worst Co-Worker of the Year," and may also say more about my own work environment and how closely I work with my other library staff, but in instances where I can tell my co-librarians are stuck and aren't able to answer the questions at hand, I will often politely chime in and offer a suggestion. I've never been asked not to do this (and boy, do I hope people aren't seething behind my back!), and I think it helps other staff to get a handle on an area of research they may not have had to work in before. In the end, the librarian learns more about a particular subject area or resource, which helps for the next time a similar question comes up, and the client gets the information they need. Again, all this works specifically when the personalities work well together, and of course, if you can find the right way to offer help or advice without causing offence.

 
At 8:47 AM, Blogger Jane said...

This is actually a question that we've asked in interviews in order to help gauge the candidate's customer service and reference interaction skills. The answer we are looking for is a combination of what Megan and Jennifer have said. It's incredibly important to not send a patron away with the wrong information. As Megan says, the stakes are too high; especially with impressionable young undergrads, or (shudder) experienced grad students or faculty.

Personally, I will cheerfully pop into the exchange, offer a pre-emptive "I am sorry to interrupt, but I thought perhaps you may want to try x". Most often, the co-worker is thankful for this intervention! Personally, I know when I am bombing with a reference question out of my league, so the offer of help is welcome.

All that being said - you are taking a risk. Your co-worker may be having a bad day, or genuinely thought they were being helpful. The trick is in how you approach the exchange, and a one-on-one follow up or email to your co-worker to ensure that no feelings have been hurt goes a long way.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home